Skip to main content

Medical Devices

By Bill Siwicki | 01:06 pm | July 08, 2019
At North Suburban Cardiology Associates in Stoneham, Massachusetts, there were several gaps in the group’s ambulatory ECG monitoring capability. Holter monitors, event monitors and mobile cardiac telemetry were on different platforms. Using different systems meant some operational friction during ordering and patient set-up as well as different platforms for analysis and reporting. Operational friction “Our Holter monitors would be downloaded in the office, then the raw data would be analyzed by a technician who worked remotely, and finally the interpreting physician would log in to that system, generate and finalize the report, and then move it into our EHR,” said Dr. Michael Mazzini, a partner at North Suburban Cardiology Associates and an assistant professor of medicine at Tufts University School of Medicine. Event monitors and mobile cardiac telemetry would be hooked up in the office, with all data management handled externally. Paper reports then were faxed to the office, reviewed and finalized by one of the group’s physicians, and again moved into the EHR. “Another issue was having immediate access to all the data with mobile cardiac telemetry rather than just getting daily summary reports,” Mazzini said. “I always wanted to have something closer to the full disclosure data that one would get with telemetry in hospital.” To help solve the problems it was facing, North Suburban Cardiology Associates turned to the MoMe Kardia wearable cardiac monitor from InfoBionic in Lowell, Massachusetts. InfoBionic offers the ability to use Holter, event monitoring and mobile cardiac telemetry all within the same device. A big step forward in efficiency “This means a uniform set-up process for all patients as well as the same analysis and reporting workflow – that alone was a big step forward in efficiency,” Mazzini explained. “Moreover, you can switch between modalities on the fly. If a Holter is non-diagnostic, for example, we can switch to event or MCT without having to bring the patient back and hook them up to a different device.” In terms of data analysis, the group now is able to efficiently manage all the data within its office. For Holter monitors, that allowed cost savings. For both event monitoring and mobile cardiac telemetry, it meant that the group had access to the data as soon as it wanted it. "Once the patient is being monitored, the ordering physician is then able to handle the rest of the monitoring process through the web-based user interface." Dr. Michael Mazzini, North Suburban Cardiology Associates “And for MCT, we now had access to near-real-time full disclosure of data – this is not a feature of other MCT platforms,” Mazzini said. “The user interface is also very intuitive in terms of both set-up and analysis. We have been able to very quickly onboard all the physicians as well as staff, and everyone is pretty facile with the system.” Setting patients up When a physician determines that a patient requires ambulatory ECG monitoring, one of the group’s medical assistants registers the patient with the device and goes through showing that patient how to use the device. “Once the patient is being monitored, the ordering physician is then able to handle the rest of the monitoring process through the web-based user interface,” Mazzini explained. “For MCT, that means that if needed, we can log in at any time to see how the patient is doing, or allow the system itself to alert us to any arrhythmias that we would be interested in.” At the end of the monitoring period, a standardized report is generated. “What is really nice is that we can use the full disclosure feature for MCT to scroll through all the data – even segments that we might not otherwise have access to in other systems, like onset and offset of supraventricular tachycardia,” Mazzini said. “As an electrophysiologist, I find this feature to be especially helpful.” Multiple, non-integrated ambulatory ECG systems Mazzini offers some advice for other cardiac caregivers considering this technology. “The technology is highly scalable – we run a small but busy office with six cardiologists and a nurse practitioner,” he said. “This platform is one that could be used efficiently in a solo practice as well as a large integrated or academic practice. “My advice would be to take a minute to assess one’s own ambulatory ECG platforms,” he added. “if they are using multiple, non-integrated ambulatory ECG systems, they definitely have an opportunity for improvement.” Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT Email the writer: bill.siwicki@himssmedia.com
By Nathan Eddy | 12:51 pm | July 05, 2019
A Frost & Sullivan report predicts that as many as 45% of ORs will be integrated with intelligent technologies within the next four years to improve the precision and predictability of surgical services.
By Benjamin Harris | 03:24 pm | July 01, 2019
The agency warns that older MiniMed devices – which have been recalled by Medtronic – could be hacked and remotely controlled, adding to the list of cyber concerns for IoT devices.
By Bill Siwicki | 04:32 pm | June 26, 2019
Three medical device technology experts from GE Healthcare, BioSig Technologies and Advantech offer comprehensive advice on best practices for healthcare organizations launching new medical devices.
By Nathan Eddy | 11:09 am | June 26, 2019
With remote patient monitoring a hot topic among healthcare providers, a new survey indicates patients would be open to outfitting themselves with wearable devices if it resulted in fewer trips to visit the doctor. WHY IT MATTERS The study of 100 participants ages 40 and over, conducted by connected healthcare solutions provider VivaLNK, found nearly two-thirds (64 percent) would put on a wearable health monitoring device if it meant it reducing the number of trips made to visit a doctor or hospital. Overall interest in wearables like a Fitbit or the Apple Watch for remote patient monitoring purposes was high, with more than half (55 percent) of respondents noting they would use such a device at home. THE LARGER TREND Healthcare organizations see the potential of RMS in combination with telehealth for convenience and cost savings, and many are currently exploring how to adopt it. In one case, use of an inhaler-connected sensor helped push the average number of COPD-related hospital trips down to an average of 2.2, compared to the year prior to study enrollment (when the average was 3.4), a recent study from the Cleveland Clinic medical center and Propeller Health found. For another example, ClearSky Medical Diagnostics currently employs Shimmer Research wearables for clinical trials, a partnership that uses Shimmer’s Verisense platform to improve analysis of sensor data for central nervous system diseases. And among the new products unveiled at HIMSS19 this past February was VitalConnect’s Vista Solution 2.0, which added a weight scale, blood pressure and pulse oximetry and core temperature reader to the existing eight vital sign measurements monitored by the company’s VitalPatch biosensor. However, there is evidence to suggest the potential benefits of RMS – not to mention the accuracy of certain devices or the security with which sensitive information is stored or transmitted – has not been fully studied.  "Remote patient monitoring … will be increasingly important," Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center CIO Dr. John Halamka wrote on his blog earlier this year. But while "many thought leaders are convinced that remote patient monitoring improves patient care," he said, "surveys suggest that health-care professionals are still not convinced." ON THE RECORD "Remote patient monitoring and the wearable devices that make it possible are not new concepts, but there's more progress that can be made by understanding patient motivations," Jiang Li, CEO of VivaLNK, said in a statement. "While the appointment can't always be avoided, RPM is the key to reducing the time, energy and money it takes to physically visit a doctor's office." As Li noted and the survey also indicated, costs of the appointment, distance, and disliking healthcare facilities were all top reasons survey respondents gave for wanting to reduce physical visits to the doctor. "Patients have always disliked visiting the doctor's office, and now there's a way to mitigate that,” Li continued. “This survey highlights what really fuels and drives consumer behavior from a healthcare perspective." Nathan Eddy is a healthcare and technology freelancer based in Berlin. Email the writer: nathaneddy@gmail.com Twitter: @dropdeaded209
By HIMSS TV | 05:45 pm | June 24, 2019
Kotona At Home is a remote delivery care treatment center whose goal is to give people the means to live at home longer.
By Nathan Eddy | 01:08 pm | June 14, 2019
Bad actors can use the Becton, Dickinson and Company Alaris Gateway Workstations to “authenticate” malicious and potentially dangerous content, CyberMDX discovered.
By HIMSS TV | 10:22 am | June 14, 2019
StethoMe CEO and co-founder Wojciech Radomski discusses his company's EC2VC-winning smart stethoscope and why AI is crucial in an era where more and more digital health devices are found in the home.
By HIMSS TV | 06:20 am | June 14, 2019
Friedrich Lämmel, CEO of EC2VC pitch competition winner Thryve, talks about the future of digital health startups as mature technologies push the boundaries of the market and user base.
By Nathan Eddy | 12:52 pm | June 12, 2019
Use of an inhaler-connected sensor helped push the average number of COPD-related hospital trips down to an average of 2.2, compared to the year prior to study enrollment when the average was 3.4 trips to the hospital.